The President Tries to Change His Health-Care Tune – James C. Capretta – The Corner on National Review Online

The President Tries to Change His Health-Care Tune – James C. Capretta – The Corner on National Review Online

Shared via AddThis

Leave a comment

Filed under 1

Breaking Down the Costs of Waxman-Markey Global Warming Legislation » The Foundry

Breaking Down the Costs of Waxman-Markey Global Warming Legislation » The Foundry

Shared via AddThis

Leave a comment

Filed under 1

Sign the petition for expanded domestic energy production!

Sign the petition for expanded domestic energy production!

Shared via AddThis

Leave a comment

Filed under 1

Glenn explains AIG and why the bonuses were not the REAL problem.

Watch Glenn’s eye opening analysis of why the AIG bonuses are not the real problem at all. 

http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/03/20/glenn-explains-aig-and-why-the-bonuses-were-not-the-real-problem/

Leave a comment

Filed under 1

Posted on the Fox Forum….Why Are Your Tax Dollars Paying For the White House’s ‘Limbaugh Strategy’?

Have you asked yourself why the White House and President are so concerned about Limbaugh?  Why would they spend so much time and so much of our money to create this little sideshow diversion?  To me, all the attention on Limbaugh only expands his stage. More people will tune in and check him out.  I don’t think many Americans think he is the voice of the GOP.  The GOP has no voice right now.  Limbaugh only talks about what many millions of Americans think…he is a conservative talk show host.  That’s it.  And apparently, what he says is worrisome enough to the Obama administration that they are attempting to smear him.  Please.  Stop.  It’s all so petty.  If the Obama administration feels so strong in their convictions and the rightness of their policies, they wouldn’t give a darn what Limbaugh talked about.  But, they do.   This tells me that they don’t feel strong enough, that they are worried.  Perhaps they are concerned that Limbaugh’s massive audience will increase, and a tipping point will occur…the point where America swings back to its’ conservative roots.   I only hope that happens sooner than later. — Mindmining.

Why Are Your Tax Dollars Paying For the White House’s ‘Limbaugh Strategy’?

By Peter Roff 

Senior Fellow, Institute for Liberty/former Senior Political Writer, United Press International

So much has been written over the last few days about radio commentator Rush Limbaugh that additional commentary might be considered piling on. It is certainly true that both the Republican Party and the broader conservative movement which, it must be restated, are separate entities, are suffering a crisis of leadership. And, as is all too typical of both institutions, the debate over their vision and direction is being carried on in public.

For the White House to employ an operative whose responsibility is, fundamentally, to direct a political strategy aimed, not at shaping is response to criticism but to take down a single media figure goes well beyond of the pale of an acceptable response.

This is not, in a word, helpful. And it is not my intention to add to the unhelpfulness of what has occurred. There are enough strong personalities already involved.

It is true that Limbaugh’s daily radio show carries considerable weight with the great majority of American conservatives. He is an articulate spokesman for the center-right coalition and, given the size of his audience, he is someone whom liberals fear.

He, like few others who occupy positions of intellectual leadership on the right, can move large numbers of people to action. Hence the efforts of the Obama White House to exploit the divisions among its opponents, seizing the opportunity to divide and conquer and to distract from their agenda to tax, spend, borrow and regulate the American people into submission. Nevertheless, the whole discussion — and the actions of the White House are included in this — creates cause for concern because of a story appearing on the Politico, a Washington-based Web site.

The American people have a right to know who this person is, what their duties are and how much they are paid. And the White House press corps has the responsibility to ask the questions that will get us the answers to these questions. This is not a matter of idle curiosity; it is a question of power, and tax dollars, being abused.

“Top Democrats believe they have struck political gold by depicting Rush Limbaugh as the new face of the Republican Party,” Politico’s Jonathan Martin wrote Wednesday, “a full-scale effort first hatched by some of the most familiar names in politics and now being guided in part from inside the White House.”

According to Martin, an unidentified “senior White House aide” has been given the responsibility of “helping to guide the Limbaugh strategy,” a very scary thing indeed.

A political operative, based inside the White House, employed by the president of the United States and receiving a salary from the American taxpayer, goes to work every day to help direct a strategy against a broadcaster whose opinions are supposed to be covered by every protection the First Amendment can provide. To quote Shakespeare, “Something is rotten.”

The business of dealing with media criticism is a thorny one for the White House. And the corridors of power lead directly to a tendency to overreach, as was the case with Nixon’s “Enemies List” and also as the George W. Bush White House after former Ambassador Joe Wilson wrote an op-ed piece for The New York Time critical of the administration’s claim that Iraq had attempted to obtain uranium in quantity from Niger. The line between appropriate and inappropriate methods of response can be a fine one indeed. For the White House to employ an operative whose responsibility is, fundamentally, to direct a political strategy aimed, not at shaping is response to criticism but to take down a single media figure goes well beyond of the pale of an acceptable response.

The American people have a right to know who this person is, what their duties are and how much they are paid. And the White House press corps has the responsibility to ask the questions that will get us the answers to these questions. This is not a matter of idle curiosity; it is a question of power, and tax dollars, being abused.

It would be one thing if a senior aide with such a job description were employed by a private organization with ties to the White House, like the Democratic National Committee. It is another thing entirely for that person to be an employee of the United States government.

Rush Limbaugh has the right to speak his mind. Millions of people tune in to his program to hear him do it every day. And we should all acknowledge that he should be able to do what he does free from fear, fear the White House may manipulate the vast resources at its disposal to make his life, in a word, difficult.

(http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/03/05/roff_limbaugh_steele/)


Leave a comment

Filed under 1

Being an American….ideas by Theodore Roosevelt

Theodore Roosevelt’s ideas on immigrants and being an American

‘In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin.

But this is predicated upon the person’s becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American. … There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all.

We have room for but one flag, the American flag. … We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language … and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.’

Theodore Roosevelt

Leave a comment

Filed under Being American

The Waste List

This stuff is stimulative?

$50 million for the National Endowment for the Arts

$380 million in the Senate bill for the Women, Infants and Children program

$300 million for grants to combat violence against women

$2 billion for federal child-care block grants

$6 billion for university building projects

$15 billion for boosting Pell Grant college scholarships

$4 billion for job-training programs, including $1.2 billion for “youths” up to the age of 24

$1 billion for community-development block grants

$4.2 billion for “neighborhood stabilization activities”

$650 million for digital-TV coupons; $90 million to educate “vulnerable populations”

$15 billion for business-loss carry-backs

$145 billion for “Making Work Pay” tax credits

$83 billion for the earned income credit

$150 million for the Smithsonian

$34 million to renovate the Department of Commerce headquarters

$500 million for improvement projects for National Institutes of Health facilities

$44 million for repairs to Department of Agriculture headquarters

$350 million for Agriculture Department computers

$88 million to help move the Public Health Service into a new building

$448 million for constructing a new Homeland Security Department headquarters

$600 million to convert the federal auto fleet to hybrids

$450 million for NASA (carve-out for “climate-research missions”)

$600 million for NOAA (carve-out for “climate modeling”)

$1 billion for the Census Bureau

$89 billion for Medicaid

$30 billion for COBRA insurance extension

$36 billion for expanded unemployment benefits

$20 billion for food stamps

$4.5 billion for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

$850 million for Amtrak

$87 million for a polar icebreaking ship

$1.7 billion for the National Park System

$55 million for Historic Preservation Fund

$7.6 billion for “rural community advancement programs”

$150 million for agricultural-commodity purchases

$150 million for “producers of livestock, honeybees, and farm-raised fish”

$2 billion for renewable-energy research ($400 million for global-warming research)

$2 billion for a “clean coal” power plant in Illinois

$6.2 billion for the Weatherization Assistance Program

$3.5 billion for energy-efficiency and conservation block grants

$3.4 billion for the State Energy Program

$200 million for state and local electric-transport projects

$300 million for energy-efficient-appliance rebate programs

$400 million for hybrid cars for state and local governments

$1 billion for the manufacturing of advanced batteries

$1.5 billion for green-technology loan guarantees

$8 billion for innovative-technology loan-guarantee program

$2.4 billion for carbon-capture demonstration projects

$4.5 billion for electricity grid

$79 billion for State Fiscal Stabilization Fund

Leave a comment

Filed under 2009 Economy